Review



lympholyte human cell separation media  (Cedarlane)


Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Cedarlane manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 90

    Structured Review

    Cedarlane lympholyte human cell separation media
    Lympholyte Human Cell Separation Media, supplied by Cedarlane, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/lympholyte human cell separation media/product/Cedarlane
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    lympholyte human cell separation media - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    99
    Miltenyi Biotec cell staining media csm buffer
    Cell Staining Media Csm Buffer, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/cell staining media csm buffer/product/Miltenyi Biotec
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    cell staining media csm buffer - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Cedarlane lympholyte human cell separation media
    Lympholyte Human Cell Separation Media, supplied by Cedarlane, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/lympholyte human cell separation media/product/Cedarlane
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    lympholyte human cell separation media - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Beijing Solarbio Science mononuclear cell separation media
    Mononuclear Cell Separation Media, supplied by Beijing Solarbio Science, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/mononuclear cell separation media/product/Beijing Solarbio Science
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mononuclear cell separation media - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Cedarlane lympholyte-m cell separation media
    Lympholyte M Cell Separation Media, supplied by Cedarlane, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/lympholyte-m cell separation media/product/Cedarlane
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    lympholyte-m cell separation media - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Cedarlane lympholyte cell separation media cl5031
    Lympholyte Cell Separation Media Cl5031, supplied by Cedarlane, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/lympholyte cell separation media cl5031/product/Cedarlane
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    lympholyte cell separation media cl5031 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Cedarlane lympholyte-poly cell separation media
    Lympholyte Poly Cell Separation Media, supplied by Cedarlane, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/lympholyte-poly cell separation media/product/Cedarlane
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    lympholyte-poly cell separation media - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Cedarlane neutrophil isolation medium lympholyte-poly cell separation media
    (A) Pathology scoring and ear thickness measurements in mice uninfected or infected with either L. major alone or with both S. aureus colonization and L. major infection (Wilcoxon, * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01; mean ± SD representative of 2 experiments; L. major-S. aureus treatment, IL-1β –/– mouse, n = 8 mice, and all other conditions , n = 6 mice). (B) Bacterial burden (CFUs) and L. major parasite burden at day 7 post- L. major infection (Wilcoxon, * p < 0.05). (C) Flow cytometric analysis of immune cell recruitment (Ly6G+, CD4 + , and CD8 + cells) in infected ear skin (Wilcoxon, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001; mean representative of 2 experiments; L. major-S. aureus treatment , IL-1β –/– mouse, n = 8 mice and all other conditions , n = 6 mice). (D) Percentage of immune cells recruited to the site of infection in mice infected with L. major with and without colonization of S. aureus . (E) Pie chart showing percentage of IL-1β+ cells that co-stain with <t>neutrophils,</t> macrophages, monocytes, and unidentified cells at 7 days post-infection. Based on flow cytometric data.
    Neutrophil Isolation Medium Lympholyte Poly Cell Separation Media, supplied by Cedarlane, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/neutrophil isolation medium lympholyte-poly cell separation media/product/Cedarlane
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    neutrophil isolation medium lympholyte-poly cell separation media - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    Cedarlane lympholyte mammal
    (A) Pathology scoring and ear thickness measurements in mice uninfected or infected with either L. major alone or with both S. aureus colonization and L. major infection (Wilcoxon, * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01; mean ± SD representative of 2 experiments; L. major-S. aureus treatment, IL-1β –/– mouse, n = 8 mice, and all other conditions , n = 6 mice). (B) Bacterial burden (CFUs) and L. major parasite burden at day 7 post- L. major infection (Wilcoxon, * p < 0.05). (C) Flow cytometric analysis of immune cell recruitment (Ly6G+, CD4 + , and CD8 + cells) in infected ear skin (Wilcoxon, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001; mean representative of 2 experiments; L. major-S. aureus treatment , IL-1β –/– mouse, n = 8 mice and all other conditions , n = 6 mice). (D) Percentage of immune cells recruited to the site of infection in mice infected with L. major with and without colonization of S. aureus . (E) Pie chart showing percentage of IL-1β+ cells that co-stain with <t>neutrophils,</t> macrophages, monocytes, and unidentified cells at 7 days post-infection. Based on flow cytometric data.
    Lympholyte Mammal, supplied by Cedarlane, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/lympholyte mammal/product/Cedarlane
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    lympholyte mammal - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    Cedarlane cl5035 dynabeadstm protein a
    (A) Pathology scoring and ear thickness measurements in mice uninfected or infected with either L. major alone or with both S. aureus colonization and L. major infection (Wilcoxon, * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01; mean ± SD representative of 2 experiments; L. major-S. aureus treatment, IL-1β –/– mouse, n = 8 mice, and all other conditions , n = 6 mice). (B) Bacterial burden (CFUs) and L. major parasite burden at day 7 post- L. major infection (Wilcoxon, * p < 0.05). (C) Flow cytometric analysis of immune cell recruitment (Ly6G+, CD4 + , and CD8 + cells) in infected ear skin (Wilcoxon, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001; mean representative of 2 experiments; L. major-S. aureus treatment , IL-1β –/– mouse, n = 8 mice and all other conditions , n = 6 mice). (D) Percentage of immune cells recruited to the site of infection in mice infected with L. major with and without colonization of S. aureus . (E) Pie chart showing percentage of IL-1β+ cells that co-stain with <t>neutrophils,</t> macrophages, monocytes, and unidentified cells at 7 days post-infection. Based on flow cytometric data.
    Cl5035 Dynabeadstm Protein A, supplied by Cedarlane, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/cl5035 dynabeadstm protein a/product/Cedarlane
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    cl5035 dynabeadstm protein a - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    Cedarlane lympholyte m cederlane
    (A) Pathology scoring and ear thickness measurements in mice uninfected or infected with either L. major alone or with both S. aureus colonization and L. major infection (Wilcoxon, * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01; mean ± SD representative of 2 experiments; L. major-S. aureus treatment, IL-1β –/– mouse, n = 8 mice, and all other conditions , n = 6 mice). (B) Bacterial burden (CFUs) and L. major parasite burden at day 7 post- L. major infection (Wilcoxon, * p < 0.05). (C) Flow cytometric analysis of immune cell recruitment (Ly6G+, CD4 + , and CD8 + cells) in infected ear skin (Wilcoxon, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001; mean representative of 2 experiments; L. major-S. aureus treatment , IL-1β –/– mouse, n = 8 mice and all other conditions , n = 6 mice). (D) Percentage of immune cells recruited to the site of infection in mice infected with L. major with and without colonization of S. aureus . (E) Pie chart showing percentage of IL-1β+ cells that co-stain with <t>neutrophils,</t> macrophages, monocytes, and unidentified cells at 7 days post-infection. Based on flow cytometric data.
    Lympholyte M Cederlane, supplied by Cedarlane, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/lympholyte m cederlane/product/Cedarlane
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    lympholyte m cederlane - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    (A) Pathology scoring and ear thickness measurements in mice uninfected or infected with either L. major alone or with both S. aureus colonization and L. major infection (Wilcoxon, * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01; mean ± SD representative of 2 experiments; L. major-S. aureus treatment, IL-1β –/– mouse, n = 8 mice, and all other conditions , n = 6 mice). (B) Bacterial burden (CFUs) and L. major parasite burden at day 7 post- L. major infection (Wilcoxon, * p < 0.05). (C) Flow cytometric analysis of immune cell recruitment (Ly6G+, CD4 + , and CD8 + cells) in infected ear skin (Wilcoxon, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001; mean representative of 2 experiments; L. major-S. aureus treatment , IL-1β –/– mouse, n = 8 mice and all other conditions , n = 6 mice). (D) Percentage of immune cells recruited to the site of infection in mice infected with L. major with and without colonization of S. aureus . (E) Pie chart showing percentage of IL-1β+ cells that co-stain with neutrophils, macrophages, monocytes, and unidentified cells at 7 days post-infection. Based on flow cytometric data.

    Journal: Cell reports

    Article Title: Staphylococcus aureus promotes strain-dependent immunopathology during cutaneous leishmaniasis through induction of IL-1β

    doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2025.115624

    Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Pathology scoring and ear thickness measurements in mice uninfected or infected with either L. major alone or with both S. aureus colonization and L. major infection (Wilcoxon, * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01; mean ± SD representative of 2 experiments; L. major-S. aureus treatment, IL-1β –/– mouse, n = 8 mice, and all other conditions , n = 6 mice). (B) Bacterial burden (CFUs) and L. major parasite burden at day 7 post- L. major infection (Wilcoxon, * p < 0.05). (C) Flow cytometric analysis of immune cell recruitment (Ly6G+, CD4 + , and CD8 + cells) in infected ear skin (Wilcoxon, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001; mean representative of 2 experiments; L. major-S. aureus treatment , IL-1β –/– mouse, n = 8 mice and all other conditions , n = 6 mice). (D) Percentage of immune cells recruited to the site of infection in mice infected with L. major with and without colonization of S. aureus . (E) Pie chart showing percentage of IL-1β+ cells that co-stain with neutrophils, macrophages, monocytes, and unidentified cells at 7 days post-infection. Based on flow cytometric data.

    Article Snippet: Neutrophil isolation medium (Lympholyte-poly cell separation media) , Cedarlane , Cat#CL5070.

    Techniques: Infection, Staining

    (A) Schematic outlining the study design of sample collection from patients with L. braziliensis infections. (B) Gene expression of IL-1β in lesion biopsies with an S. aureus -dominant or heterogeneous microbiome profile (Wilcoxon, ** p < 0.01). (C) Relative neutrophils in lesion biopsies as determined by cell estimation (XCell) (Wilcoxon, * p < 0.05). (D) GO pathway analysis comparing lesion biopsies with S. aureus dominance or a heterogeneous microbiome (Fisher’s one-tailed test with Benjamini-Hochberg adjustment, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, and **** p < 0.0001).

    Journal: Cell reports

    Article Title: Staphylococcus aureus promotes strain-dependent immunopathology during cutaneous leishmaniasis through induction of IL-1β

    doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2025.115624

    Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Schematic outlining the study design of sample collection from patients with L. braziliensis infections. (B) Gene expression of IL-1β in lesion biopsies with an S. aureus -dominant or heterogeneous microbiome profile (Wilcoxon, ** p < 0.01). (C) Relative neutrophils in lesion biopsies as determined by cell estimation (XCell) (Wilcoxon, * p < 0.05). (D) GO pathway analysis comparing lesion biopsies with S. aureus dominance or a heterogeneous microbiome (Fisher’s one-tailed test with Benjamini-Hochberg adjustment, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, and **** p < 0.0001).

    Article Snippet: Neutrophil isolation medium (Lympholyte-poly cell separation media) , Cedarlane , Cat#CL5070.

    Techniques: Gene Expression, One-tailed Test

    (A) Schematic of bacterial swab extraction and isolate identification by MALDI-TOF. (B) Quantification of the frequency of bacterial species recovered from 44 human cutaneous leishmaniasis lesions. Each species is only counted once per lesion. (C) Phylogenetic tree of S. aureus clinical isolates and reference genomes. Layered onto the tree is each isolate’s methicillin resistance status and clonal complex. (D) ELISA quantifying levels of IL-1β recovered from mouse and human neutrophils infected with CLSA2 and CLSA50 strains (Wilcoxon, *** p < 0.001). (E) Bacterial survival of CLSA2 and CLSA50 in response to infection of human and mouse neutrophils for 1 h (paired t test, * p < 0.05). n = 4 human donors; n = 5 mice.

    Journal: Cell reports

    Article Title: Staphylococcus aureus promotes strain-dependent immunopathology during cutaneous leishmaniasis through induction of IL-1β

    doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2025.115624

    Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Schematic of bacterial swab extraction and isolate identification by MALDI-TOF. (B) Quantification of the frequency of bacterial species recovered from 44 human cutaneous leishmaniasis lesions. Each species is only counted once per lesion. (C) Phylogenetic tree of S. aureus clinical isolates and reference genomes. Layered onto the tree is each isolate’s methicillin resistance status and clonal complex. (D) ELISA quantifying levels of IL-1β recovered from mouse and human neutrophils infected with CLSA2 and CLSA50 strains (Wilcoxon, *** p < 0.001). (E) Bacterial survival of CLSA2 and CLSA50 in response to infection of human and mouse neutrophils for 1 h (paired t test, * p < 0.05). n = 4 human donors; n = 5 mice.

    Article Snippet: Neutrophil isolation medium (Lympholyte-poly cell separation media) , Cedarlane , Cat#CL5070.

    Techniques: Extraction, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Infection